In all the subjects in the schools, the children have to develop very specific skills to consider that he has
reached the established level, and CLIL is not less. However, somehow, CLIL
should be considered a way to develop skills that support the development of
the skills required in the rest of the subjects. For example, CLIL is a way of
helping students to understand vocabulary of the world of rocks, which is a
topic normally connected to “Science”. Indeed we are talking about different
things, but if we do not have enough time to study rock´s vocabulary deeply, we
must provide to the students help in a different way.
With these first knowledge, we
can say that CLIL helps students to affront there difficulties of other
subjects in a second language, but we ca not do it without connecting them with
those subjects. This means that the same topic must be seen in at the same time
in the two subjects. If we use the example that I have suggested before, we
cannot work the topic of the rocks in “Science” and then two weeks later see it
in CLIL. It must be approached at the same time; otherwise it will create a lot
of confusion in the children.


To conclude, in all the
subjects a teacher must be trained sufficiently to provide a good learning process
and make sure that the development of different skills is working. Their duty
is to increase those skills or abilities which the students are good at and supporting
them in their problems. Besides, society should be cornered about the important
role of parents in the education of the children, without them it is impossible
to create an appropriate learning environment.
References:
- BREWSTER, J. AND ELLIS, G.
(1991). The Primary English Teacher´s
Guide. England: Pearson Education Limited.
- CLOUD, N., GENESEE, F. AND
HAMAYAN, E. (2009). Literacy Instructions
for English Language Learners. United States of America: Heinemann.